cell tower David Burbach225With some major issues on the agenda, Meaford's council chamber was filled to capacity and beyond on March 24, with many who turned out to the meeting having to listen to the proceedings from the lobby.

One of those issues appeared to have attracted the bulk of the attendees – resident concerns about a proposed cell tower near Meaford's high school.

Meaford resident Gough Lewis addressed council as spokesperson for a delegation, and asked councillors to consider the potential health effects that could result from placement of a microwave cell tower in a residential area on Edwin Street in close proximity to Georgian Bay Secondary School.

With the new data coming out that demonstrates potentially devastating medical health issues, this is of great concern to our community. The placement of a microwave cell tower next to the school is clearly the worst location within our municipality, chosen by Simpson & McKay Financial Services, the sub-contractor for Rogers,” Lewis told council. “Although this tower is proposed for a residential area, there has not been a proper notification nor a proper community consultation within the new federal guidelines for cell tower placement.”

The Municipality of Meaford does not have a policy for the location of cell towers, and Lewis asked council to consider implementing a policy as soon as possible.

We are aware that our municipality does not have a policy for cell tower placement under the new federal laws. We believe a policy on cell tower placement is of the utmost importance. I ask council to do two things. First, ensure that we develop a policy on cell tower placement within the Municipality of Meaford. Secondly, I ask council to ensure that our municipal staff require the developer of Rogers Site C4272, Meaford Town, to comply with the new federal policy and Meaford’s future adopted policy. Please allow the public a chance to express their concerns on this important issue,” Lewis asked of council.

In addition to Lewis, other community members also made statements asking for council to act quickly, including Meaford home builder Andrew Couper, who lives near the proposed tower.

I am 203 metres from the [proposed] tower. I am a taxpayer, a husband, a father, and a businessman,” Couper told council. “I moved my family into a clean, safe neighbourhood, and suddenly now I'm being told that our clean, safe neighbourhood is getting a cell tower.”

Couper told council that the World Health Organization has listed microwave radiation as a potential carcinogen.

Should I wait to see if my daughters get cancer?” asked Couper.

After listening to the delegates, council responded quickly with a resolution at the ready. Council unanimously approved the following resolution:

Whereas Rogers Telecommunications has proposed the construction of a microwave type cell tower on a property known as 71 Edwin St. East, in the urban area of the Municipality of Meaford;

Whereas the municipality has been asked to comment upon the construction and   placement of such towers;

Whereas the announcement of said proposed tower has brought forth many negative concerns about the location, from a widespread group of concerned citizens;

Whereas much information has been   distributed through the media claiming that such towers can pose a variety of health risks;

Whereas electromagnetic radiation guidelines, including the level of transmissions from wireless towers are to be reviewed this year by Health Canada, with the potential of a reduction in the level of permitted emissions;

And whereas the Municipality of Meaford at present has no by-law policy on the subject of microwave cell tower placement .

Therefore, be it resolved that Council hereby instruct staff to research and establish a policy report for the placement of such towers within our municipality.

And that Council urge Health Canada to hasten its development and passage of planned new regulations for Safety Code 6 and distribute them to all municipalities.

And furthermore, that Industry Canada be informed that no official comment  upon the construction of the Rogers tower on Edwin street be forwarded for a period of ninety days, or until the new cell tower policy is examined and passed,  and request  that Industry Canada restrain from making a decision on the tower proposal within that 90 day period.

A group of concerned residents have organized a public rally that is planned for Thursday March 27 at noon outside Meaford Hall.